|
|||||||||
| About Us | News & Events | Useful Contacts | Sexuality, Gender & Islam | Resources & Downloads | Publications | Urdu | |||
|
-Domestic
Violence & Refuges |
Isolation-Initial findings report 2003 | ||||||||
Findings 3.2 There are some relevant resources on the Internet (chat rooms and information on homosexuality in Islam), but many of these are aimed at men rather than women. In addition, not all Muslim LBT women have access to or are familiar with the use of the Internet. Many would also like or prefer access to spaces where they can meet and interact with people who share similar experiences in person. 3.3 Many Muslim LBT women feel that they do not belong to either LGBT or Muslim communities. The common belief is that ‘Muslims are not gay ’ and ‘gay people can not be Muslim ’. This misconception is often reinforced by Muslim community leaders as well as by other Muslims. The perception is also perpetuated in the (LGBT) media where Islam is often portrayed as an extremist, archaic and homophobic religion. This ignores diversity in the Muslim communities and alienates LGBT Muslims. 3.4 Many Muslim LBT women do not identify with the (visible) gay scene, which is predominantly white and often revolves around alcohol-related social activities. Moreover, racism, Islamophobia and cultural insensitivity within the gay scene are alienating factors that are often ignored. 3.5 Many Muslim LBT women would not feel comfortable going to a LBT social support group whilst still struggling with their own LBT identity. They also feel that (some of) the issues they face are very culturally specific and not suitable to discuss in such a group. At the same time, they would also not feel at ease to come out in an Asian women ’s social support group because of the negative reaction they anticipate. 3.6 Some women who went to existing race or faith-specific social groups found that these groups either failed to include the issue of religion or remained male-dominated and patriarchal. Some were very nervous or scared when they first went to such groups and were not welcomed as newcomers. 3.7 Homophobic bullying in schools
often compounds the isolation of young LGBT people. Schools are known to
be some of the most homophobic institutions
in the UK. Bullying, whether homophobic or racist, is often ignored by school/college
staff. Homophobic bullying can be even more problematic than racist abuse,
because it is considered part of ‘playground culture ’. Moreover,
homophobic remarks by staff themselves are also often ignored or accepted.
Tackling the situation is complicated by Section 28 of the Local Government
Act 1988,which stipulates that local authorities should not “intentionally
promote homosexuality ” and that schools should not teach about the “acceptability
of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship”. 3.9Media coverage needs to be more responsible in demonstrating the diversity of both the Muslim and the gay communities. Whilst visibility of LGBT Muslims is important, media coverage should not be sensationalist or Islamophobic. Service providers should not perpetuate inaccurate representations of Muslims, LGBT or Muslim LGBT people in the media. 3.10 Schools and colleges should reduce the isolation of young LGBT people by tackling homophobic and transphobic bullying and racist bullying. The government should facilitate this by repealing S.28 of the Local Government Act 1988 and sending out a strong message that homophobia isunacceptable. LGBT issues should be included in educational programmes. |
|||||||||
Site Search: |
Our
contact:
Safra Project P.O. Box 45079, London, N4 3YD, England, UK Email: info@safraproject.org |
||||||||
| Information on this website is offered for the purpose of providing general information only and should not be construed as formal advice. The Safra Project disclaims any liability resulting from reliance on this information. |
|||||||||